Can a project exist that is capable of integrating and at the same time subverting the architectural banality that capitalist tactics seem to elicit?  And how might it eliminate the polarized professional positions of “resistance” and “integration” - both of which are concepts remaining from a modernist demagogy that is scarcely relevant in a world dominated by global capitalism but that still seems to constrain the architect who has aspirations as intellectual or critic?

-from Tower and Office by Inaki Abalos & Juan Herreros